• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header left navigation
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
  • Welcome
  • Contact
Wholistic Woman

Wholistic Woman

Embracing a whole life approach to wellness

  • Media Kit
  • Disclosure & Privacy Policies
  • Recipes
  • Health & Fitness
  • Productivity
  • Creativity

The Power of With: 6 Weeks Until Uganda

You are here: Home / Other / Uncategorized / The Power of With: 6 Weeks Until Uganda
June 9, 2011 by Wendy Hammond

I had the privilege of attending the Coalition of Supporting Indigenous Ministries (COSIM) conference this week. So inspirational! The highlight by far was the session led by Steve Corbett, co-author of When Helping Hurts: How to Alleviate Poverty without Hurting the Poor . . . and Yourself.

I had the privilege of attending the Coalition of Supporting Indigenous Ministries (COSIM) conference this week. So inspirational! The highlight by far was the session led by Steve Corbett, co-author of When Helping Hurts: How to Alleviate Poverty without Hurting the Poor . . . and Yourself.

In upcoming weeks I’ll explore some of the topics covered in the book, but today I wanted to talk about the power of with. This theme was reiterated again and again during the conference.

What do I mean by “the power of with”? In his book Communities First, Jay Van Groningen discusses this concept. Although written with a North American church’s local outreach approach in mind, it is applicable overseas as well.

The church “in’ community

  • Does not desire to influence the community
  • Does not desire community members to influence it
  • Invests nearly all its resources on its own members
  • May be described as a fortress, holding the outside world back
  • Takes up space in the neighborhood; many members commute into the neighborhood for services and meetings and then leave again; the church does not pay taxes and is a net drain on the community.

The church “to” the community

  • Desires to bless and make contributions to the community (on its own terms)
  • Does not desire community members to influence it
  • Spends some resources in the community (but usually a small percentage of the total budget)
  • Limits or suppresses the influence of community stakeholders in its planning or assessment process.
  • Serves the community for reasons it prefers and with methods it prefers, and assumes it knows what is best for the community.
  • Overlooks the gifts, skills, and resources already in the community that achieve the same result.
  • Takes up space in the neighborhood, sometimes sharing it with the community.

The church “with” the community

  • Desires to influence the community
  • Desires community stakeholders to influence it
  • Spends significant resources (time, talent, goods) in the community
  • Utilizes planning and assessment processes that are influenced by both church members and community stakeholders, and makes decisions based on the impact desired by church members and neighbors
  • Serves and develops the community for reasons and with methods that bring transformational impact to the community and church alike.
  • Looks for and unleashes the gifts, skills, and resources already present in the community.
  • Is a convener of the community, a servant to the community, adding value to residents and the community as a whole’ a net contributor to the community even though it does not pay taxes.

What does “ministry with” look like overseas? Watch this video to find out:

 

How is this different or the same as the ministries you are involved with?

Share this:

  • Print
  • Tweet
  • More
  • Share on Tumblr
Category: Uncategorized

Reader Interactions

What's on your mind? Cancel reply

Sidebar

What are you looking for?